Peer Review Process

Techno Xplore implements a peer review process to ensure the scientific quality of every published manuscript. This process is conducted carefully, objectively, and with a strong emphasis on academic integrity. The stages of the review process at Techno Xplore are as follows:

1. Initial Editorial Screening

Each submitted manuscript is reviewed by the editor to assess its suitability with the journal’s focus and scope, completeness of manuscript components, and compliance with formatting requirements. At this stage, the editor determines whether the manuscript can proceed to the next stage or should be rejected.

2. Double-Blind Review

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to two reviewers without disclosing the identities of the authors or the reviewers. The review is conducted independently to ensure objectivity.

3. Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on the following aspects:

• Novelty and scientific contribution
• Appropriateness of the methodology
• Clarity of analysis and discussion
• Accuracy of conclusions
• Quality of references and completeness of citations

4. Reviewers’ Recommendations

Reviewers provide revision notes along with recommendations, which may include:

• Accepted
• Revision required
• Rejected

All comments and recommendations are forwarded to the editor for consideration.

5. Editorial Decision

The editor makes the final decision based on the reviewers’ evaluations. The decision may be:

• Accepted
• Minor revision
• Major revision
• Rejected

The editor’s decision is final.

6. Copyediting and Publication

Manuscripts that are accepted proceed to the final editing stage, layout preparation, and publication according to the scheduled issue.