A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COPYRIGHT DISPUTE RESOLUTION THROUGH ARBITRATION BETWEEN INDONESIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36805/0wbfpq39Keywords:
Copyright, Arbitration, Dispute Resolution, Indonesia, UKAbstract
Settling copyright disputes through arbitration is an out-of-court alternative that is considered more efficient, faster, and maintains the confidentiality of the parties' business. Indonesia, through Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration, has opened up space for non-litigation copyright dispute resolution. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom with its common law system has developed a more mature arbitration mechanism through the Arbitration Act 1996 and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This article aims to comparatively analyze the arbitration system in resolving copyright disputes in Indonesia and the United Kingdom. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that although both countries recognize arbitration as a dispute resolution forum, the United Kingdom has a more advanced legal infrastructure, international arbitration institutions, and practices than Indonesia. This study recommends strengthening copyright arbitration in Indonesia by adopting best practices from the UK, particularly regarding the specialization of IP arbitrators and the effectiveness of the enforcement of arbitral awards.
References
Etty Susilowati, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Lisensi Pada HKI, (Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP PRESS,2013),halaman 1.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2019), hlm. 142.
Gary B. Born, International Commercial Arbitration, (Kluwer Law International, 2014), hlm. 21.
M. Yahya Harahap, Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018), hlm. 56.
United Nations, Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958).
WIPO, Arbitration and Mediation Center Overview, (Geneva: WIPO Publication, 2020).
WIPO, What is Copyright?, (Geneva: WIPO Publication, 2019).
Sudargo Gautama, Hak Milik Intelektual, (Bandung: Alumni, 2017), hlm. 93.
UU No. 28 Tahun 2014, Pasal 95 ayat (4).
René David & John Brierley, Major Legal Systems in the World Today, (London: Stevens & Sons, 1985), hlm. 25.
New York Convention 1958, Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
Djoni Sumardi, “Efektivitas Arbitrase dalam Sengketa HKI,” Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis, Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021), hlm. 144.
Redfern & Hunter, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, (Oxford: OUP, 2015), hlm. 101
WIPO, International Arbitration Review, (2022), hlm. 58.
Konrad Zweigert & Hein Kötz, An Introduction to Comparative Law, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), hlm. 53.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ali Abdulah, Ade Maman Suherman, Tri Setiady, Wiwin Triyunarti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Deposit & Pengarsipan Mandiri
Naskah artikel versi pra-cetak (draf awal), versi diterima (draf akhir), dan versi penerbit (PDF terbitan) boleh diarsipkan mandiri di situs web pribadi atau repositori institusional milik penulis dengan tetap mencantumkan status progres dan sumber asli yang merujuk pada website jurnal ini.
Preservasi & Pengarsipan Sistem
Jurnal ini tergabung dalam jaringan PKP Preservation Network, yang menyediakan layanan preservasi dan pengarsipan secara otomatis apabila terjadi sesuatu yang menyebabkan jurnal ini tidak terbit lagi (trigger event).
