PENGARUH PERAN KEPEMIMPINAN, KOMUNIKASI DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA UPTD PUSKESMAS KECAMATAN KLARI KABUPATEN KARAWANG

Eneng Sukmayanti

Abstract


ABSTRAK
The purpose of this study is to obtain empirical evidence and to find clarity of phenomena and conclusions about the influence of leadership role, communication, and work environment on employee performance at UPTD Puskesmas Kecamatan Klari Kabupaten Karawang.
This thesis is expected to contribute to the development of management science, especially as a contribution of scientific literature in human resources management, as reference material in scientific writing, as an information material, both for leaders and colleagues in District Health Office Karawang in the implementation of performance-based management, As a material consideration and input in making decisions and determine the direction of policy.
The research is done by using quantitative method with descriptive and verification method, that is collecting, presenting, analyzing and doing hypothesis testing, and making conclusion and suggestion. Based on the results of the research analysis, the following conclusions are obtained:
1. The correlation of leadership (X1) with communication (X2) has a correlation coefficient value (r) of 0.512 and if interpreted by the closeness of relationship between these two variables has a fairly strong level of relationship (Sugiyono, 2005:255) and unidirectional because the value is positive. This shows that if leadership increases then communication will also increase. Conversely, if communication increases then leadership will also increase.
2. Communication correlation (X2) with work environment (X3) has correlation coefficient (r) value of 0.343 and if interpreted with the closeness of relationship of these two variables have a low level of relationship (Sugiyono, 2005:255) and unidirectional because the value is positive. This shows that if communication increases then the work environment will also increase. Conversely, if the work environment increases then communication will also increase.
3. The correlation of leadership (X1) with work environment (X3) has a correlation coefficient value (r) of 0.359 and if interpreted by the closeness of the relationship of these two variables have a low level of relationship (Sugiyono, 2005:255) and unidirectional because the value is positive. This shows that if leadership increases then the work environment will also increase. Conversely, if the work environment increases then leadership will also increase.
4. The magnitude of the influence of leadership role on employee performance is 24.4%. Based on the findings of this study can be concluded that the hypothesis of research that states "leadership has significant effect on employee performance" is acceptable.
5. The magnitude of communication effect on employee performance is 14.2%. Based on the findings of this study can be concluded that the hypothesis of research that states "communication has significant effect on employee performance" is acceptable.
6. The amount of work environment influence on employee performance is 13.4%. Based on the findings of this study it can be concluded that the research hypothesis which states "work environment contribute significantly to the performance of employees" is acceptable.
7. Simultaneously leadership (X1), communications (X2), and work environment (X3) have a significant effect on employee performance (Y) of 52.0%. The remaining 48.0% is the effect that comes from other factors.


Keywords : Role of Leadership, Communication, Work Environment, Employee Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitiaan Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. PT. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Artina, et all. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Budaya Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Disiplin Kerja dan Kinerja Personil Polda Riau. Jurnal Tepak Manajemen Bisnis, Vo. VI No. 2 Mei 2014. Hal 9-19.

Dessler, Gary. 2009. Manajemen SDM. Buku 1. Indeks, Jakarta.

Fathoni, Abdurrahmat. 2006. Organisasi dan Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Gomes, Foustino Cardoso. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.

Handoko, T. Hani. 2001. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Heidjarachman dan Husnan. 2002. Manajemen Personalia. BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Hoy and Miskel. 2001. Manajemen. Terjemahan: Antariksa et all. Erlangga, Jakarta.

Kartasasmita, Ginandjar. 1997. Administrasi Pembangunan, Perkembangan Pemikiran dan Prakteknya di Indonesia. Cetakan Pertama. LP3ES, Jakarta.

Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Moelyono, Djokosantoso. 2004. Penerapan Produktivitas dalam Organisasi, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Nawawi, H., 2006. Evaluasi dan Manajemen Kinerja di Lingkungan Perusahaan dan Industri. Cetakan Kesatu. Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Nitisemito, A.S, 2005. Manajemen Personalia (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia ). Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Nurmanto, Safri. 2007. Budaya Organisasi, dari Chester I Barnard ke Michael E. Porter. Selo Soemardjan Research Centre FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 53 Tahun 2010 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil.

Prayitno, Widyo Yudo. 2004. Budaya Kerja, Kemampuan dan Komitmen Pegawai Negeri Sipil di Biro Kepegawaian Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.

Rahayu, Kurniasih Panti, 2010. Pengaruh Budaya Kerja dan Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Lingkungan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Tesis. Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Rivai, Veithzal, 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan. Edisi Kedua. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Riduwan dan Kuncoro, 2007. Cara Menggunakan dan Memaknai Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis). Cetakan Pertama. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Robin, Stephan P., 2008. Perilaku Organisasi. Buku 1. Edisi 12. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Saydam, Gouzali. 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Gunung Agung, Jakarta.

Sedarmayanti. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Cetakan Keempat. PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Siagian, Sondang. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Siswanto, Bejo. 2005. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja, Rancangan Dalam Pendayungan dan pengembangan Unsur Tenaga Kerja. Sinar Baru, Bandung.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. CV. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Sutermeister. 2001. Manajemen. Erlangga, Jakarta.

The New Grolier Webster International Dictionary of the English Language, 1999. London.

Tris, Laras. 2006. Analisis Pengaruh Komunikasi, Kecerdasan Emosional dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Kasus PT. Pos Indonesia Persero se-Kota Semarang. Tesis. Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1974 tentang Pokok-Pokok Kepegawaian (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1974 Nomor 55, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3041) sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 1999 (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 169, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3890).

Wirawan. 2009. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia, Teori, Aplikasi, dan Penelitian. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.